PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLV vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
0.10%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%6.24%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
2.59%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than TAIL's 2.59% return.


QLV

1D
1.54%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.74%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

TAIL

1D
-2.50%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.59%
6M
0.83%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
-4.32%
5Y*
-6.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVTAILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.15

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

0.38

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.06

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.16

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.18

0.19

+5.99

QLV vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLV and TAIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVTAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.15

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

-0.46

+1.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.43

+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between QLV and TAIL is -0.57. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

QLV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than TAIL's 3.20% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.60%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%0.00%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.20%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%

Drawdowns

QLV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and TAIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-52.36%

+18.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-16.24%

+6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-38.44%

+20.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-47.03%

+42.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-28.70%

+24.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

13.27%

-11.39%

Volatility

QLV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 3.18%, while Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLVTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

4.39%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.81%

7.04%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

17.81%

-5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

14.89%

-2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

15.06%

+1.69%