PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLV vs. HYGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLV vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 1.42% return.


QLV

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.14%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.38%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*

HYGV

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.66%
1Y
6.94%
3Y*
8.38%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLV vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
5.48%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%6.24%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
1.42%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QLV and HYGV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.68

The correlation between QLV and HYGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLV vs. HYGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLV
HYGV

Technology

28.6%

-

Healthcare

12.7%

-

Financial Services

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.5%

-

Communication Services

8.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%

-

Utilities

6.5%

-

Industrials

6.3%

-

Energy

5.8%
100.0%

Basic Materials

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

QLV
28.6%
HYGV

-

Healthcare

QLV
12.7%
HYGV

-

Financial Services

QLV
12.3%
HYGV

-

Consumer Defensive

QLV
8.5%
HYGV

-

Communication Services

QLV
8.4%
HYGV

-

Consumer Cyclical

QLV
6.8%
HYGV

-

Utilities

QLV
6.5%
HYGV

-

Industrials

QLV
6.3%
HYGV

-

Energy

QLV
5.8%
HYGV
100.0%

Basic Materials

QLV
2.4%
HYGV

-

Real Estate

QLV
1.7%
HYGV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLV vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLV vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVHYGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.60

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

11.22

-1.53

QLV vs. HYGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the HYGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLV and HYGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVHYGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.81

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.46

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.55

+0.14

Drawdowns

QLV vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and HYGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVHYGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-23.47%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-2.68%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-5.56%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-17.12%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.27%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.32%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

0.62%

+0.83%

Volatility

QLV vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 1.17%. This indicates that QLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVHYGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

1.17%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.34%

3.02%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.65%

3.85%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

7.59%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

9.20%

+7.37%

QLV vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLV vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than HYGV's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
7.41%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLV and HYGV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLV has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to HYGV (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLV dropped -33.71% vs HYGV's -23.47%.

On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 3.49% for HYGV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

QLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for QLV and 0.37% for HYGV.

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLV and HYGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer