PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFNX vs. QLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
-11.23%6.71%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
-3.02%6.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -11.23% return, which is significantly lower than QLENX's -3.02% return.


QLFNX

1D
2.20%
1M
-5.83%
YTD
-11.23%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLENX

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-3.02%
6M
4.33%
1Y
19.17%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
22.25%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLFNX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QLENX's 5.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLFNX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLFNX

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFNXQLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

1.21

-2.08

Correlation

The correlation between QLFNX and QLENX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than QLENX's 1.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.16%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
1.69%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%

Drawdowns

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and QLENX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFNXQLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-38.50%

+23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.33%

-3.62%

-8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-7.54%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

Volatility

QLFNX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLFNXQLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

8.65%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

10.21%

+5.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

10.55%

+5.47%