PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFNX vs. JAKRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than JAKRX's 12.80% return.


QLFNX

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.52%
YTD
0.17%
6M
3.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JAKRX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.00%
YTD
12.80%
6M
13.69%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QLFNX and JAKRX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFNX vs. JAKRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLFNX

JAKRX
JAKRX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
JAKRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAKRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAKRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAKRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAKRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class A (JAKRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFNXJAKRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

3.97

-3.14

Drawdowns

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, which is greater than JAKRX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and JAKRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFNXJAKRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-5.16%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-0.66%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-0.80%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFNXJAKRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

7.43%

+8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.88%

7.29%

+8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

7.29%

+8.59%

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKRX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFNX vs. JAKRX - Dividend Comparison

QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than JAKRX's 7.18% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QLFNX and JAKRX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFNX and JAKRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer