QLEIX vs. FFLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) and FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, QLEIX returned 16.04% vs -0.45% for FFLS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLEIX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.

Performance

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLEIX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than FFLS's -0.26% return.

QLEIX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 4.79%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 27.72%
• 5Y*: 21.93%
• 10Y*: 12.02%

FFLS

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: -0.66%
• 1Y: -0.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	0.38%	34.43%	30.50%	13.90%
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-0.26%	7.49%	17.71%	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between QLEIX and FFLS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.28

Return for Risk

QLEIX vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLEIX

QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 8
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLEIX	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	-0.05	+2.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	-0.01	+3.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.00	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	-0.04	+2.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.50	-0.09	+8.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLEIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FFLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLEIX and FFLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLEIX	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	-0.05	+2.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.80	+0.33

Drawdowns

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLEIX drawdown since its inception was -38.11%, which is greater than FFLS's maximum drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLEIX and FFLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLEIX	FFLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.11%	-11.05%	-27.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.01%	-11.05%	+5.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-4.96%	+4.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-3.09%	-4.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	5.07%	-3.16%

Volatility

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) is 2.18%, while The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that QLEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLEIX	FFLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.18%	3.54%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.57%	6.92%	-1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.24%	8.94%	-1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.10%	11.23%	-1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.58%	11.23%	-0.65%

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLEIX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLEIX vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

QLEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than FFLS's 6.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.59%	6.58%	3.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	1.75%	1.75%	7.12%	20.88%	14.15%	0.00%	1.57%	0.00%	6.03%	9.11%	3.01%	4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLEIX and FFLS in my portfolio?

QLEIX and FFLS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLEIX or FFLS?

FFLS has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to QLEIX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLEIX dropped -38.11% vs FFLS's -11.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.