QLDY vs. QQQT
Compare and contrast key facts about Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT).
QLDY and QQQT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLDY is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Sep 17, 2025. QQQT is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Jun 20, 2024.
Performance
QLDY vs. QQQT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLDY vs. QQQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | -9.50% | 1.50% |
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF | -4.89% | 1.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT's -4.89% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQT
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLDY vs. QQQT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQT's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. QQQT — Risk / Return Rank
QLDY
QQQT
QLDY vs. QQQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF (QQQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLDY | QQQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.36 | -1.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and QQQT is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QLDY vs. QQQT - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.76%, less than QQQT's 23.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 19.76% | 9.34% | 0.00% |
QQQT Defiance Nasdaq 100 Income Target ETF | 23.01% | 21.27% | 10.35% |
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. QQQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum QQQT drawdown of -22.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and QQQT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | QQQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -22.50% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.33% | -8.78% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -4.26% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility
QLDY vs. QQQT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | QQQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 21.51% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 20.63% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 20.63% | -0.94% |