QLDY vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. QLDY is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

QLDY vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

QLDY

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 11.63%
• YTD: 19.28%
• 6M: 16.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLDY vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF	19.28%	1.50%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QLDY and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	-0.30

Return for Risk

QLDY vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLDY vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLDY	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	0.14	+1.46

Drawdowns

QLDY vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLDY	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-87.06%	+69.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.29%	+10.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.25%	-40.17%	+35.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLDY	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.57%	41.46%	-21.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	35.38%	-15.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	36.68%	-17.11%

QLDY vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLDY vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF	21.47%	9.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLDY and BNO in my portfolio?

QLDY and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QLDY or BNO?

On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLDY or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLDY or BNO?

QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 21.47%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between QLDY and BNO?

QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.90% for BNO.