QLDY vs. AIPO
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. QLDY is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
QLDY vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 32.32% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -4.06%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- YTD
- 32.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 9.82% | 1.54% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 32.32% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and AIPO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, roughly equal to the maximum AIPO drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -17.31% | -0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -15.82% | +7.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -4.77% | +0.42% |
Volatility
QLDY vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 36.08% | -14.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 36.08% | -14.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 36.08% | -14.24% |
QLDY vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.28%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 28.28% | 9.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLDY and AIPO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 28.28%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AIPO is Building & Construction. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer