QLC vs. IQDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and IQDF (FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while IQDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QLC returned 14.83%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for IQDF. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IQDF.

Performance

QLC vs. IQDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly lower than IQDF's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, QLC has outperformed IQDF with an annualized return of 14.83%, while IQDF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.

QLC

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 11.88%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 25.39%
• 5Y*: 15.29%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

IQDF

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 15.38%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 35.90%
• 3Y*: 22.80%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 9.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. IQDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	11.39%	23.26%	26.71%	26.02%	-17.21%	28.46%	13.64%	24.51%	-8.12%	21.73%
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund	15.38%	35.42%	6.62%	20.10%	-14.69%	10.18%	3.54%	20.96%	-17.39%	23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and IQDF is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015	0.67

The correlation between QLC and IQDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. IQDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLC	IQDF
Technology	34.8%	15.6%
Financial Services	13.8%	25.9%
Communication Services	13.8%	4.9%
Healthcare	10.1%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	6.9%
Industrials	6.6%	13.2%
Utilities	3.4%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	5.7%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.3%
Basic Materials	2.2%	8.3%
Energy	2.0%	7.2%

Return for Risk

QLC vs. IQDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 81
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IQDF

IQDF Risk / Return Rank: 74
IQDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IQDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IQDF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IQDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IQDF Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. IQDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLC	IQDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	2.50	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	3.35	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.44	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	3.60	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.59	13.93	+3.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLC vs. IQDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the IQDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and IQDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLC	IQDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	2.50	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.68	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.58	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.44	+0.36

Drawdowns

QLC vs. IQDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum IQDF drawdown of -39.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and IQDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLC	IQDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-39.83%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-10.03%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-13.92%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	-30.34%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.86%	-39.83%	+3.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-1.02%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-9.34%	+4.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	2.58%	-0.69%

Volatility

QLC vs. IQDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) is 2.94%, while FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund (IQDF) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that QLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLC	IQDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	5.63%	-2.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	12.23%	-2.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	14.44%	-2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	15.49%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	16.63%	+1.79%

QLC vs. IQDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IQDF's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLC vs. IQDF - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than IQDF's 2.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQDF FlexShares International Quality Dividend Index Fund	2.77%	3.27%	6.72%	6.06%	5.59%	4.13%	3.31%	4.46%	5.78%	3.89%	3.75%	4.27%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.88%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLC and IQDF in my portfolio?

QLC and IQDF have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLC or IQDF?

IQDF has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to QLC (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs IQDF's -39.83%.

Which ETF is better, QLC or IQDF?

On 10-year performance, QLC leads with 14.83% vs 9.66% for IQDF. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLC or IQDF?

Over the 10-year period, QLC has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 9.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLC or IQDF?

QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IQDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLC or IQDF?

IQDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.88% for QLC.

What is the main difference between QLC and IQDF?

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IQDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while IQDF tracks Northern Trust International Quality Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.47% for IQDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.