PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QIG vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QIG vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - QIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QIG returned 2.50%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. QIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

QIG vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, QIG has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 2.50%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.

QIG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
2.50%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIG vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund		0.49%7.85%2.28%8.48%-16.25%-1.52%9.75%13.97%-2.01%7.00%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QIG and BNO is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016

-0.08

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between QIG and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with QIG:
QIG vs. USIGQIG vs. BBCBQIG vs. DHSQIG vs. BSCQQIG vs. DBOQIG vs. FLRNQIG vs. GDE
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

QIG vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QIG
QIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIG vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QIGBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.43
2.23

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.11
2.73

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

5.17

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

9.76

-2.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QIG vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIG and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QIGBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.23

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.69

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.37

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.14

+0.19

Drawdowns

QIG vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIG and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QIGBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-87.06%

+64.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-17.87%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-23.75%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-33.70%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.92%

-75.18%

+52.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-10.29%

+8.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-40.17%

+34.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

9.45%

-8.59%

Volatility

QIG vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) is 1.35%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that QIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QIGBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

14.22%

-12.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

36.10%

-33.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

41.46%

-37.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

35.38%

-28.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

36.68%

-29.14%

QIG vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

QIG vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

QIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund		4.88%4.82%4.67%4.19%4.25%2.50%2.61%3.00%3.27%2.88%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

QIG and BNO have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to QIG (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIG dropped -22.92% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.60% vs 2.50% for QIG. On fees, QIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 2.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

QIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

QIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. QIG tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QIG and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIG and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer