PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIG vs. MILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIG vs. MILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIG achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 0.94% return.


QIG

1D
-0.08%
1M
-1.63%
6M
-1.05%
YTD
-0.73%
1Y
1.78%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
2.21%
ALL TIME*
2.29%

MILK

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.69%
6M
0.04%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$195.76K$144.48K$113.75K
$95.62K$92.11K$52.06K

QIG vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
-0.73%7.85%-1.08%
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
0.94%7.49%-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QIG and MILK is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024

0.93

The correlation between QIG and MILK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIG vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QIG
QIG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

MILK
MILK Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QIG vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QIGMILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.17

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.28

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

4.33

-1.70

QIG vs. MILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the MILK Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIG and MILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QIG vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than MILK's maximum drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIG and MILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIGMILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-6.16%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-3.75%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-2.13%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-1.13%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.11%

-0.14%

Volatility

QIG vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) is 1.04%, while Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that QIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIGMILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.15%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

3.82%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

5.01%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.09%

6.55%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

6.55%

+0.99%

QIG vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIG vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison

QIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than MILK's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
7.07%6.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
4.99%4.82%4.67%4.19%4.25%2.50%2.61%3.00%3.27%2.88%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, QIG and MILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MILK has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to QIG (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIG dropped -22.92% vs MILK's -6.16%.

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 4.12% vs 1.78% for QIG. On fees, QIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 4.99% for QIG.

QIG tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QIG and 0.49% for MILK.

MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIG and MILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer