PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIDX vs. RSHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIDX vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIDX achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 33.69% return.


QIDX

1D
-0.44%
1M
1.58%
YTD
6.98%
6M
6.58%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSHO

1D
0.12%
1M
7.69%
YTD
33.69%
6M
33.85%
1Y
57.71%
3Y*
31.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIDX vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
6.98%8.16%
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
33.69%20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between QIDX and RSHO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.78

The correlation between QIDX and RSHO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIDX vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RSHO
RSHO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RSHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSHO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RSHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSHO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIDX vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIDXRSHODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.44

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

3.28

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.40

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.96

-2.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.31

15.16

-9.85

QIDX vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIDX and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIDXRSHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.44

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.48

-0.73

Drawdowns

QIDX vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIDX drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIDX and RSHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIDXRSHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-27.31%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-14.64%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-4.32%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.82%

-1.72%

Volatility

QIDX vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) is 2.87%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that QIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIDXRSHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

9.22%

-6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

20.09%

-11.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.98%

23.74%

-12.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

22.55%

-7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.60%

22.55%

-7.95%

QIDX vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIDX vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than RSHO's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.86%0.84%0.00%0.00%
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
0.22%0.30%0.26%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIDX and RSHO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to QIDX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIDX dropped -14.99% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

On 1-year performance, RSHO leads with 57.71% vs 11.10% for QIDX. On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 57.71% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.22% for RSHO.

They also come from different issuers: Indexperts and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QIDX and 0.75% for RSHO.

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIDX and RSHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer