PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIDX vs. GQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIDX vs. GQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIDX achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than GQI's 9.82% return.


QIDX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.29%
6M
6.42%
YTD
10.40%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.90%

GQI

1D
0.91%
1M
1.51%
6M
7.93%
YTD
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$866.96K$1.04M$2.05M
$53.70K$62.72K$42.16K

QIDX vs. GQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QIDX and GQI is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.77

The correlation between QIDX and GQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIDX vs. GQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QIDX
QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GQI
GQI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QIDX vs. GQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QIDXGQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.98

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

15.46

-9.08

QIDX vs. GQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the GQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIDX and GQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QIDX vs. GQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIDX drawdown since its inception was -14.99%, smaller than the maximum GQI drawdown of -16.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIDX and GQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIDXGQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.99%

-16.56%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-6.96%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.12%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.13%

-1.62%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.34%

+0.72%

Volatility

QIDX vs. GQI - Volatility Comparison

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) and Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIDXGQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.49%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

7.65%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

9.99%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

13.01%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.20%

13.01%

+1.19%

QIDX vs. GQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIDX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GQI's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIDX vs. GQI - Dividend Comparison

QIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than GQI's 8.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GQI
Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF
7.83%8.97%7.77%0.31%
QIDX
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
0.86%0.84%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIDX and GQI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIDX has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to GQI (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIDX dropped -14.99% vs GQI's -16.56%.

On 1-year performance, GQI leads with 22.33% vs 14.22% for QIDX. On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GQI has performed better with a 22.33% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QIDX.

GQI has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 0.86% for QIDX.

They also come from different issuers: Indexperts and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QIDX and 0.34% for GQI.

GQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIDX and GQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer