GQI vs. LSGR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GQI (Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF) and LSGR (Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GQI is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Natixis, while LSGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Natixis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GQI returned 22.33% vs 2.27% for LSGR. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GQI charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for LSGR.

Performance

GQI vs. LSGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQI achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than LSGR's -4.29% return.

GQI

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.51%
• 6M: 7.93%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.45%

LSGR

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: -3.08%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 1Y: 2.27%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	$866.96K	$1.04M	$2.05M
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	$2.37M	$2.84M	$2.94M

GQI vs. LSGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	9.82%	15.36%	15.99%	1.60%
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	-4.29%	15.32%	38.52%	4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GQI and LSGR is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023	0.84

The correlation between GQI and LSGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

GQI vs. LSGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GQI	LSGR
Technology	37.9%	32.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	16.9%
Healthcare	10.9%	9.8%
Communication Services	10.3%	26.8%
Financial Services	9.9%	5.4%
Industrials	8.3%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.1%	4.9%
Energy	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

GQI vs. LSGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQI

GQI Risk / Return Rank: 86
GQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GQI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
GQI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

LSGR

LSGR Risk / Return Rank: 11
LSGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
LSGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
LSGR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LSGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LSGR Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQI vs. LSGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQI	LSGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	-0.00	+2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	0.12	+2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.01	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	-0.00	+2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.46	-0.01	+15.47

GQI vs. LSGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the LSGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQI and LSGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQI vs. LSGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQI drawdown since its inception was -16.56%, smaller than the maximum LSGR drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQI and LSGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQI	LSGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-22.92%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-18.13%	+11.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-7.31%	+7.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.62%	-4.09%	+2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	6.51%	-5.17%

Volatility

GQI vs. LSGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF (GQI) is 2.49%, while Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that GQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQI	LSGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.49%	6.18%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	14.30%	-6.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.99%	18.05%	-8.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.01%	20.48%	-7.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.01%	20.48%	-7.47%

GQI vs. LSGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQI has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than LSGR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQI vs. LSGR - Dividend Comparison

GQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, while LSGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GQI Natixis Gateway Quality Income ETF	7.83%	8.97%	7.77%	0.31%
LSGR Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF	0.00%	0.05%	0.08%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQI and LSGR in my portfolio?

GQI and LSGR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQI or LSGR?

LSGR has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to GQI (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQI dropped -16.56% vs LSGR's -22.92%.

Which ETF is better, GQI or LSGR?

On 1-year performance, GQI leads with 22.33% vs 2.27% for LSGR. On fees, GQI is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, GQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GQI or LSGR?

Over the 1-year period, GQI has performed better with a 22.33% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GQI or LSGR?

GQI is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LSGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GQI or LSGR?

GQI has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 0.00% for LSGR.

What is the main difference between GQI and LSGR?

GQI is categorized as Quality Factor, while LSGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for GQI and 0.59% for LSGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.