QID vs. SOXL
QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QID returned -39.47%/yr vs 68.93%/yr for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. QID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
QID vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -31.93% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 615.61% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -39.47%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 68.93% annualized return.
QID
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -31.93%
- 6M
- -30.64%
- 1Y
- -49.05%
- 3Y*
- -38.43%
- 5Y*
- -31.45%
- 10Y*
- -39.47%
SOXL
- 1D
- 7.69%
- 1M
- 57.83%
- YTD
- 615.61%
- 6M
- 595.26%
- 1Y
- 1,322.96%
- 3Y*
- 141.01%
- 5Y*
- 51.34%
- 10Y*
- 68.93%
QID vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -31.93% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 615.61% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between QID and SOXL is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | -0.83 |
The correlation between QID and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
QID vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QID
SOXL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QID
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
QID
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
QID
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
QID
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
QID
-
SOXL
-
Energy
QID
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
QID
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
QID
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
QID
-
SOXL
-
Technology
QID
-
SOXL
Utilities
QID
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QID vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
QID
SOXL
QID vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QID | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.65 | -0.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 30.78 | -31.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.94 | 99.38 | -101.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QID vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QID | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -90.46% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.52% | -43.47% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.50% | -87.88% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.72% | -90.46% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.37% | -90.46% | -8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | 0.00% | -99.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.02% | -34.95% | -52.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.66% | 13.44% | +13.22% |
Volatility
QID vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 16.52%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 62.02%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QID | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 62.02% | -45.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.23% | 96.02% | -67.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.23% | 114.45% | -79.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.26% | 109.85% | -64.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.81% | 100.50% | -55.69% |
QID vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QID vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 7.63% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QID and SOXL have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (62.02%) compared to QID (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 68.93% vs -39.47% for QID. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 16.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 68.93% return vs -39.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QID.
QID has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QID and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.72 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QID and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer