PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QID vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QID vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 65.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed KORU with an annualized return of -37.32%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively higher 2.30% annualized return.


QID

1D
-1.22%
1M
6.86%
6M
-19.38%
YTD
-21.02%
1Y
-35.07%
3Y*
-33.07%
5Y*
-27.97%
10Y*
-37.32%
ALL TIME*
-34.54%

KORU

1D
-7.92%
1M
-44.63%
6M
-13.80%
YTD
65.13%
1Y
302.72%
3Y*
42.96%
5Y*
-3.04%
10Y*
2.30%
ALL TIME*
-1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$685.69M$790.89M$775.54M
$255.66M$222.38M$304.58M

QID vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QID
ProShares UltraShort QQQ
-21.02%-34.97%-34.06%-57.19%66.30%-44.93%-69.71%-49.57%-9.90%-44.00%
KORU
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares
65.13%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QID and KORU is -0.72, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013

-0.57

The correlation between QID and KORU shifts across timeframes, from -0.72 (1 year) to -0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QID vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QID
KORU

Financial Services

64.8%
8.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.7%

Energy

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

3.1%

Industrials

-

15.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

61.3%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Financial Services

QID
64.8%
KORU
8.8%

Basic Materials

QID

-

KORU
1.2%

Communication Services

QID

-

KORU
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QID

-

KORU
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

QID

-

KORU
1.7%

Energy

QID

-

KORU
1.0%

Healthcare

QID

-

KORU
3.1%

Industrials

QID

-

KORU
15.4%

Real Estate

QID

-

KORU

-

Technology

QID

-

KORU
61.3%

Utilities

QID

-

KORU
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QID vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QID
QID Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QID Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QID Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
QID Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QID Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QID vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QIDKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.34

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

3.32

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

9.21

-10.56

QID vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QID Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QID and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QID vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, roughly equal to the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIDKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-95.79%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.65%

-80.90%

+36.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.50%

-80.90%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.72%

-92.74%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.21%

-95.79%

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-76.30%

-23.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.09%

-57.44%

-29.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.20%

29.12%

-4.92%

Volatility

QID vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 13.93%, while Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 64.87%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIDKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.93%

64.87%

-50.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.16%

154.02%

-121.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.79%

159.66%

-120.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.80%

96.56%

-50.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.96%

85.82%

-40.86%

QID vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

QID vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than KORU's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KORU
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.53%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%
QID
ProShares UltraShort QQQ
7.46%6.25%7.99%5.63%0.15%0.00%0.92%2.54%1.38%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


QID and KORU have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (64.87%) compared to QID (13.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, KORU leads with 2.30% vs -37.32% for QID. On fees, QID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 13.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KORU has performed better with a 2.30% return vs -37.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.32% for KORU.

QID has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 0.53% for KORU.

QID is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KORU is South Korea Equities. QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QID and 1.32% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QID and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer