QHDG vs. XCLR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QHDG (Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF) and XCLR (Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. QHDG is actively managed, while XCLR is passively managed. Over the past year, QHDG returned 11.61% vs 13.37% for XCLR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QHDG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XCLR.

Performance

QHDG vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QHDG achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than XCLR's 2.37% return.

QHDG

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 11.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XCLR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QHDG vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QHDG Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF	1.03%	12.13%	6.35%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	2.37%	10.25%	4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QHDG and XCLR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	0.89

The correlation between QHDG and XCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

QHDG vs. XCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QHDG	XCLR
Technology	53.8%	35.6%
Communication Services	15.8%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	4.9%
Healthcare	4.2%	8.5%
Industrials	2.8%	8.3%
Utilities	1.4%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.8%
Energy	0.6%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	2.0%

Return for Risk

QHDG vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QHDG

QHDG Risk / Return Rank: 37
QHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
QHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
QHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 37

XCLR

XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 41
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QHDG vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QHDG	XCLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.57	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.17	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	1.62	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.69	6.51	-0.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QHDG vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QHDG and XCLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QHDG	XCLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	1.57	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.73	+0.16

Drawdowns

QHDG vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, roughly equal to the maximum XCLR drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHDG and XCLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QHDG	XCLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.29%	-14.63%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.00%	-8.29%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-0.05%	-0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-4.71%	+2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.06%	-0.01%

Volatility

QHDG vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF (QHDG) is 0.26%, while Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that QHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QHDG	XCLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.26%	0.61%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.54%	6.18%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	8.58%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.44%	10.44%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.44%	10.44%	+2.00%

QHDG vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QHDG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QHDG vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

QHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QHDG Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	12.85%	13.15%	18.76%	1.40%	1.01%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QHDG and XCLR in my portfolio?

QHDG and XCLR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QHDG or XCLR?

XCLR has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to QHDG (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHDG dropped -15.29% vs XCLR's -14.63%.

Which ETF is better, QHDG or XCLR?

On 1-year performance, XCLR leads with 13.37% vs 11.61% for QHDG. On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QHDG has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QHDG or XCLR?

Over the 1-year period, XCLR has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QHDG or XCLR?

XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QHDG or XCLR?

XCLR has the higher dividend yield at 12.85%, compared with 0.00% for QHDG.

What is the main difference between QHDG and XCLR?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QHDG and 0.25% for XCLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.