QGRW vs. HCMPX
QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) and HCMPX (HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund) are both funds - QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while HCMPX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Howard Capital Management. Over the past 3 years, QGRW returned 26.28%/yr vs 22.06%/yr for HCMPX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for HCMPX.
Performance
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than HCMPX's 3.01% return.
QGRW
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 26.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMPX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 9.00% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.07% |
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 3.01% | 15.92% | 43.56% | 16.87% | -3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRW and HCMPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QGRW and HCMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRW vs. HCMPX — Risk / Return Rank
QGRW
HCMPX
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QGRW | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.02 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 6.49 | -0.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum HCMPX drawdown of -28.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and HCMPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRW | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -28.88% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -10.42% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -18.43% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -4.64% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -7.94% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 3.24% | +0.90% |
Volatility
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund (HCMPX) at 6.96%. This indicates that QGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRW | HCMPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 6.96% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.10% | 12.62% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 17.70% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 19.65% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.27% | 20.18% | +1.09% |
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HCMPX's 2.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRW vs. HCMPX - Dividend Comparison
QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than HCMPX's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMPX HCM Dividend Sector Plus Fund | 0.42% | 0.43% | 29.52% | 5.15% | 8.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 12.87% | 8.64% | 4.18% | 2.18% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRW and HCMPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRW has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to HCMPX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs HCMPX's -28.88%.
QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRW and HCMPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer