PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRO vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRO vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return.


QGRO

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.28%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.57%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*

VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRO vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
2.19%15.18%31.42%32.42%-24.54%24.57%37.99%35.09%-16.85%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRO and VV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.89

The correlation between QGRO and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QGRO vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QGRO
VV

Technology

37.1%
35.9%

Industrials

13.6%
8.0%

Healthcare

12.7%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
9.8%

Communication Services

11.0%
11.2%

Financial Services

5.9%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.8%

Energy

1.8%
3.6%

Utilities

0.9%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.6%

Technology

QGRO
37.1%
VV
35.9%

Industrials

QGRO
13.6%
VV
8.0%

Healthcare

QGRO
12.7%
VV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QGRO
12.0%
VV
9.8%

Communication Services

QGRO
11.0%
VV
11.2%

Financial Services

QGRO
5.9%
VV
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

QGRO
3.8%
VV
4.8%

Energy

QGRO
1.8%
VV
3.6%

Utilities

QGRO
0.9%
VV
2.7%

Real Estate

QGRO
0.9%
VV
1.7%

Basic Materials

QGRO
0.3%
VV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRO vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRO
QGRO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRO vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QGROVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.42

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.03

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

13.86

-11.17

QGRO vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRO and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QGROVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

2.33

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.79

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.59

+0.07

Drawdowns

QGRO vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGROVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.56%

-54.81%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-9.21%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.82%

-18.97%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.86%

-25.66%

-6.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.72%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-6.84%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

2.01%

+2.02%

Volatility

QGRO vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGROVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

2.84%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.71%

8.98%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

11.99%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

17.22%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.93%

18.19%

+4.74%

QGRO vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRO vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QGRO
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF
0.19%0.25%0.25%0.41%0.46%0.31%0.22%0.38%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


QGRO and VV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.54% vs 12.22% for QGRO. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.

VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.

QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.04% for VV.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRO and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer