QGRO vs. VV
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QGRO tracks the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR) while VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.22%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
QGRO vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 10.69% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
VV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
QGRO vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.85% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.69% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and VV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QGRO and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
VV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
VV
Industrials
QGRO
VV
Healthcare
QGRO
VV
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
VV
Communication Services
QGRO
VV
Financial Services
QGRO
VV
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
VV
Energy
QGRO
VV
Utilities
QGRO
VV
Real Estate
QGRO
VV
Basic Materials
QGRO
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
VV
QGRO vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.42 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 3.03 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 13.86 | -11.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.33 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.79 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.59 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -54.81% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -9.21% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -18.97% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -25.66% | -6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.72% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -6.84% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.01% | +2.02% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.84%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.84% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 8.98% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.99% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 17.22% | +3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 18.19% | +4.74% |
QGRO vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than VV's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and VV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.54% vs 12.22% for QGRO. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer