QGRO vs. QARP
QGRO (American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QGRO tracks the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 11.03%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
QGRO vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 12.78% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 7.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 1.20% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.08% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and QARP is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between QGRO and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
QARP
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
QARP
Communication Services
QGRO
QARP
Healthcare
QGRO
QARP
Industrials
QGRO
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
QARP
Financial Services
QGRO
QARP
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
QARP
Utilities
QGRO
QARP
Energy
QGRO
QARP
Real Estate
QGRO
QARP
Basic Materials
QGRO
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
QARP
QGRO vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QGRO | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.43 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 3.46 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | 15.38 | -13.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -35.44% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -7.26% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -15.65% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -22.75% | -9.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | 0.00% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -4.39% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 1.63% | +2.44% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 2.76% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 8.22% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 10.58% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 15.54% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 19.55% | +3.32% |
QGRO vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and QARP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 11.03% for QGRO. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.18% for QGRO.
QGRO tracks American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer