QGRO vs. DGRW
QGRO (American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - QGRO tracks the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index while DGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 9.69%/yr vs 11.72%/yr for DGRW. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
QGRO vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 10.05% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.87%
DGRW
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.74M | $49.20M | $56.02M | |
| $8.71M | $8.72M | $14.21M |
QGRO vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 1.31% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.08% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 10.05% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -12.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and DGRW is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between QGRO and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
DGRW
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
DGRW
Communication Services
QGRO
DGRW
Industrials
QGRO
DGRW
Healthcare
QGRO
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
DGRW
Financial Services
QGRO
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
DGRW
Energy
QGRO
DGRW
Utilities
QGRO
DGRW
Real Estate
QGRO
DGRW
-
Basic Materials
QGRO
DGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
DGRW
QGRO vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QGRO | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.31 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 2.13 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 8.60 | -6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRW drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -32.04% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -8.30% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -16.21% | -7.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -17.27% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | 0.00% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -3.00% | -4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 2.05% | +2.08% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.19%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 3.19% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 8.44% | +4.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.20% | 10.47% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 14.02% | +7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 16.19% | +6.64% |
QGRO vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than DGRW's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.26% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and DGRW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to DGRW (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 5-year performance, DGRW leads with 11.72% vs 9.69% for QGRO. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.18% for QGRO.
QGRO tracks American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.28% for DGRW.
DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer