QGRO vs. AVUS
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century. QGRO is passively managed, while AVUS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.22%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for AVUS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
QGRO vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 14.42% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- 32.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 9.24% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.42% | 16.68% | 20.43% | 21.77% | -13.82% | 28.73% | 17.58% | 8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and AVUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between QGRO and AVUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
AVUS
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
AVUS
Industrials
QGRO
AVUS
Healthcare
QGRO
AVUS
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
AVUS
Communication Services
QGRO
AVUS
Financial Services
QGRO
AVUS
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
AVUS
Energy
QGRO
AVUS
Utilities
QGRO
AVUS
Real Estate
QGRO
AVUS
Basic Materials
QGRO
AVUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
AVUS
QGRO vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.48 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 4.14 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 18.85 | -16.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.68 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.76 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.80 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -37.04% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -7.85% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -19.74% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -22.19% | -9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.46% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -5.09% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 1.72% | +2.31% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) at 2.98%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.98% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 9.00% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 12.15% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 17.29% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 20.85% | +2.08% |
QGRO vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than AVUS's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and AVUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to AVUS (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs AVUS's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.04% vs 12.22% for QGRO. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.15% for AVUS.
AVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer