QGRO vs. AVEM
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while AVEM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.22%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for AVEM. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
QGRO vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 27.59% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AVEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 55.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 7.77% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.59% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and AVEM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QGRO and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
AVEM
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
AVEM
Industrials
QGRO
AVEM
Healthcare
QGRO
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
AVEM
Communication Services
QGRO
AVEM
Financial Services
QGRO
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
AVEM
Energy
QGRO
AVEM
Utilities
QGRO
AVEM
Real Estate
QGRO
AVEM
Basic Materials
QGRO
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
AVEM
QGRO vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.51 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 4.21 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 16.70 | -14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.84 | -2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -36.05% | +3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -13.13% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -18.02% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -34.00% | +2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.39% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -10.09% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 3.30% | +0.73% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) is 3.38%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that QGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 8.33% | -4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 16.72% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 19.45% | -4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 18.34% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 20.55% | +2.38% |
QGRO vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than AVEM's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and AVEM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to QGRO (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 12.22% vs 9.92% for AVEM. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVEM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer