QFRD vs. QARP
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QFRD tracks the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
QFRD vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QARP
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.48K | $118.49K | $177.11K | |
| $22.97K | $34.82K | $12.88K |
QFRD vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 13.35% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and QARP is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QARP
QFRD vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFRD | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -35.44% | +25.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -0.14% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -4.37% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 10.71% | +8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 15.52% | +3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 19.51% | -0.34% |
QFRD vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFRD vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% |
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and QARP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QFRD.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD tracks S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.19% for QARP.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer