QFRD vs. FLRT
QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QFRD is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders Index, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. QFRD is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
QFRD vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFRD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.88M | $4.59M | $4.78M | |
| $22.97K | $34.82K | $12.88K |
QFRD vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 13.35% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFRD and FLRT is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFRD vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
QFRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLRT
QFRD vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFRD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFRD vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFRD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -20.96% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | 0.00% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -1.39% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.48% | — |
Volatility
QFRD vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFRD | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 1.49% | +17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 2.30% | +16.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 6.09% | +13.08% |
QFRD vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFRD vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FLRT's 6.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 6.72% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFRD and FLRT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QFRD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QFRD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.72%, compared with 0.11% for QFRD.
QFRD is categorized as Quality Factor, while FLRT is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.60% for FLRT.
Find the right allocation for QFRD and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer