QEMM vs. EMIF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF).

QEMM and EMIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QEMM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. EMIF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2009. Both QEMM and EMIF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QEMM vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QEMM vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.84%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	31.50%
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF	6.16%	33.90%	1.21%	5.67%	-12.59%	3.76%	-19.98%	16.36%	-13.70%	20.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than EMIF's 6.16% return. Over the past 10 years, QEMM has outperformed EMIF with an annualized return of 7.09%, while EMIF has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.

QEMM

• 1D: 2.95%
• 1M: -6.92%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 26.47%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: 7.09%

EMIF

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -8.08%
• YTD: 6.16%
• 6M: 12.77%
• 1Y: 39.99%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEMM vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.

EMIF

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF

QEMM

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

Return for Risk

QEMM vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 82
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

EMIF

EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 95
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEMM vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QEMM	EMIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.41	-0.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	3.15	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.47	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.78	-1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	13.68	-4.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEMM vs. EMIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the EMIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and EMIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QEMM	EMIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	2.41	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.33	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.13	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.18	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and EMIF is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QEMM vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, which matches EMIF's 4.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.67%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF	4.67%	4.96%	4.12%	2.64%	3.08%	3.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.64%	2.58%	3.16%	2.07%

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum EMIF drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and EMIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QEMM	EMIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.89%	-48.02%	+11.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-10.49%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.55%	-23.68%	-3.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.89%	-48.02%	+11.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.76%	-8.65%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-16.00%	+5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	2.89%	-0.04%

Volatility

QEMM vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) at 7.64%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QEMM	EMIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.11%	7.64%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.57%	12.00%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.21%	16.67%	+0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	19.63%	-4.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	20.61%	-3.88%