PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QEMM vs. ECOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

QEMM vs. ECOW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW).

QEMM and ECOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QEMM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. ECOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. Both QEMM and ECOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QEMM vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QEMM vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF		4.84%21.92%4.98%12.50%-17.82%6.34%9.95%4.89%
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF		9.29%32.50%3.17%15.79%-19.28%7.47%-2.51%10.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEMM achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than ECOW's 9.29% return.

QEMM

1D
2.95%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
4.84%
6M
8.64%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
7.09%

ECOW

1D
2.44%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.97%
1Y
37.65%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF

Often compared with QEMM:
QEMM vs. MXFP.LQEMM vs. SPDWQEMM vs. EMGFQEMM vs. JHMBQEMM vs. EMIM.LQEMM vs. URTHQEMM vs. AEME.L
Often compared with ECOW:
ECOW vs. EYLDECOW vs. MOTIECOW vs. EEMSECOW vs. FEDDXECOW vs. DFEVXECOW vs. COWZECOW vs. DEM

QEMM vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEMM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.

ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

Return for Risk

QEMM vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QEMM
QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
ECOW
ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEMM vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QEMMECOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

2.28

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.87

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.85

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.33

14.23

-4.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QEMM vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEMM and ECOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QEMMECOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.28

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.39

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.36

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between QEMM and ECOW is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QEMM vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

QEMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than ECOW's 4.76% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QEMM
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF		4.67%4.90%5.17%4.88%4.07%2.35%2.48%3.05%2.86%2.11%2.03%2.14%
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF		4.76%5.20%7.35%5.46%7.50%4.39%3.35%8.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QEMM vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEMM drawdown since its inception was -36.89%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEMM and ECOW.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

QEMMECOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.89%

-40.27%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-13.09%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

-33.67%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.76%

-4.82%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-11.29%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.63%

+0.22%

Volatility

QEMM vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 7.25%. This indicates that QEMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

QEMMECOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.11%

7.25%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

11.25%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

16.60%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

17.66%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

20.26%

-3.53%