PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QEFA vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QEFA vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPYD's 13.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QEFA having a 9.48% annualized return and SPYD not far behind at 9.19%.


QEFA

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
6.75%
6M
6.33%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
9.48%

SPYD

1D
0.75%
1M
2.24%
YTD
13.71%
6M
13.22%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QEFA vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
6.75%29.25%2.27%17.40%-14.03%12.50%6.76%21.91%-10.39%24.03%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
13.71%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QEFA and SPYD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.59

The correlation between QEFA and SPYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QEFA vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QEFA
SPYD

Financial Services

14.3%
11.9%

Healthcare

11.4%
5.3%

Technology

10.5%
3.2%

Industrials

9.1%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
7.3%

Basic Materials

4.9%
3.0%

Energy

4.3%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
16.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
4.8%

Utilities

2.3%
11.2%

Real Estate

1.7%
26.5%

Financial Services

QEFA
14.3%
SPYD
11.9%

Healthcare

QEFA
11.4%
SPYD
5.3%

Technology

QEFA
10.5%
SPYD
3.2%

Industrials

QEFA
9.1%
SPYD
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QEFA
6.2%
SPYD
7.3%

Basic Materials

QEFA
4.9%
SPYD
3.0%

Energy

QEFA
4.3%
SPYD
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

QEFA
4.2%
SPYD
16.0%

Communication Services

QEFA
3.2%
SPYD
4.8%

Utilities

QEFA
2.3%
SPYD
11.2%

Real Estate

QEFA
1.7%
SPYD
26.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QEFA vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QEFA
QEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
QEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
QEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
QEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QEFA vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QEFASPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.92

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

8.40

-1.88

QEFA vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QEFA and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QEFA vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QEFASPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.71%

-46.42%

+14.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-7.05%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-16.13%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-22.25%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.71%

-46.42%

+14.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.97%

-0.88%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-6.14%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.44%

+0.28%

Volatility

QEFA vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QEFASPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.62%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

8.05%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

11.87%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

16.07%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.86%

19.78%

-3.92%

QEFA vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

QEFA vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than SPYD's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QEFA
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF
2.87%3.13%3.17%2.79%3.02%2.37%1.82%2.95%3.22%2.33%2.01%2.94%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.22%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


QEFA and SPYD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QEFA has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to SPYD (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEFA dropped -31.71% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, QEFA leads with 9.48% vs 9.19% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QEFA has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QEFA.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 2.87% for QEFA.

QEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. QEFA tracks MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEFA and 0.07% for SPYD.

SPYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QEFA and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer