QEFA vs. LVHI
QEFA (SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QEFA returned 7.76%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for LVHI. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QEFA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
QEFA vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QEFA achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 12.09% return.
QEFA
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 30.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- —
QEFA vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QEFA SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF | 7.48% | 29.25% | 2.27% | 17.40% | -14.03% | 12.50% | 6.76% | 21.91% | -10.39% | 24.03% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 12.09% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between QEFA and LVHI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between QEFA and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
QEFA vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QEFA
LVHI
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
QEFA
LVHI
Healthcare
QEFA
LVHI
Technology
QEFA
LVHI
Industrials
QEFA
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
QEFA
LVHI
Energy
QEFA
LVHI
Basic Materials
QEFA
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
QEFA
LVHI
Communication Services
QEFA
LVHI
Utilities
QEFA
LVHI
Real Estate
QEFA
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QEFA vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
QEFA
LVHI
QEFA vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QEFA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.62 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 5.10 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | 21.22 | -14.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QEFA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 3.28 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 1.44 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.82 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
QEFA vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QEFA drawdown since its inception was -31.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QEFA and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QEFA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.71% | -32.31% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.58% | -6.08% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.23% | -11.99% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -11.99% | -16.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -1.23% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -3.52% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 1.46% | +1.20% |
Volatility
QEFA vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF (QEFA) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.89%. This indicates that QEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QEFA | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 2.89% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 7.50% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 9.45% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 11.06% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 13.76% | +2.27% |
QEFA vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QEFA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QEFA vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
QEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than LVHI's 6.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 6.10% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
QEFA SPDR MSCI EAFE StrategicFactors ETF | 2.85% | 3.13% | 3.17% | 2.79% | 3.02% | 2.37% | 1.82% | 2.95% | 3.22% | 2.33% | 2.01% | 2.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QEFA and LVHI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QEFA has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to LVHI (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QEFA dropped -31.71% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.88% vs 7.76% for QEFA. On fees, QEFA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QEFA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 2.85% for QEFA.
QEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. QEFA tracks MSCI EAFE Factor Mix A-Series (USD), while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for QEFA and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QEFA and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer