QDVO vs. PAPI
QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and PAPI (Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDVO returned 26.60% vs 13.61% for PAPI. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PAPI.
Performance
QDVO vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than PAPI's 6.49% return.
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPI
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 9.91% | 20.16% | 11.80% |
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 6.49% | 6.33% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVO and PAPI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.15 |
The correlation between QDVO and PAPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDVO vs. PAPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDVO
PAPI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
QDVO
PAPI
Communication Services
QDVO
PAPI
Consumer Cyclical
QDVO
PAPI
Consumer Defensive
QDVO
PAPI
Healthcare
QDVO
PAPI
Financial Services
QDVO
PAPI
Basic Materials
QDVO
PAPI
Industrials
QDVO
PAPI
Energy
QDVO
PAPI
Utilities
QDVO
PAPI
Real Estate
QDVO
-
PAPI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVO vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank
QDVO
PAPI
QDVO vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDVO | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.99 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 5.35 | +5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDVO | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.31 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.90 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
QDVO vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than PAPI's maximum drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and PAPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVO | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -14.27% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -6.86% | -3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -4.45% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -2.73% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.55% | -0.04% |
Volatility
QDVO vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 2.20%. This indicates that QDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVO | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.20% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 7.02% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.21% | 10.47% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 11.76% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 11.76% | +5.66% |
QDVO vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVO vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison
QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, more than PAPI's 7.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.57% | 7.59% | 7.07% | 1.45% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 10.11% | 9.92% | 2.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVO and PAPI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDVO has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to PAPI (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs PAPI's -14.27%.
On 1-year performance, QDVO leads with 26.60% vs 13.61% for PAPI. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDVO has performed better with a 26.60% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.
QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.11%, compared with 7.57% for PAPI.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.29% for PAPI.
QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDVO and PAPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer