PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVO vs. PAPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QDVO vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QDVO vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
-5.75%20.16%11.80%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
8.31%6.33%0.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly lower than PAPI's 8.31% return.


QDVO

1D
3.02%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-5.75%
6M
-3.27%
1Y
20.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAPI

1D
0.54%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
8.31%
6M
9.20%
1Y
11.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QDVO vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QDVO vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVOPAPIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

0.82

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.23

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.16

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.08

+0.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.80

4.62

+3.18

QDVO vs. PAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the PAPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and PAPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVOPAPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

0.82

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.02

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and PAPI is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QDVO vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, more than PAPI's 7.50% yield.


TTM202520242023
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
11.26%9.92%2.79%0.00%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.50%7.59%7.07%1.45%

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than PAPI's maximum drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and PAPI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVOPAPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-14.27%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-11.59%

+1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-2.82%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-2.57%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.72%

-0.01%

Volatility

QDVO vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 3.21%. This indicates that QDVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QDVOPAPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

3.21%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

7.51%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

14.14%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.02%

11.96%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

11.96%

+6.06%