QDVO vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDVO returned 25.91% vs 27.18% for MAGS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

QDVO vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 1.00% return.

QDVO

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 9.48%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -4.61%
• YTD: 1.00%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 31.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVO vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	8.25%	20.16%	9.76%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.00%	22.99%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and MAGS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	0.87

The correlation between QDVO and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDVO vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDVO	MAGS
Technology	50.4%	10.9%
Communication Services	15.4%	5.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	-
Healthcare	4.9%	-
Financial Services	3.8%	-
Industrials	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-
Energy	0.9%	-
Utilities	0.4%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

QDVO vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 38
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDVO	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.34	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	1.86	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	1.47	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.10	4.94	+5.16

QDVO vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDVO	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-29.91%	+12.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-18.62%	+8.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-6.09%	+3.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-4.72%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	5.52%	-2.95%

Volatility

QDVO vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is 4.16%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that QDVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDVO	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	6.52%	-2.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	15.28%	-5.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.68%	20.48%	-7.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.56%	25.99%	-8.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	25.99%	-8.43%

QDVO vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDVO vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%, more than MAGS's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.47%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.27%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDVO and MAGS in my portfolio?

QDVO and MAGS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDVO or MAGS?

MAGS has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to QDVO (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, QDVO or MAGS?

On 1-year performance, MAGS leads with 27.18% vs 25.91% for QDVO. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QDVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDVO or MAGS?

Over the 1-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 27.18% return vs 25.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDVO or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDVO or MAGS?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.27%, compared with 1.47% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between QDVO and MAGS?

QDVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.29% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.