QDVO vs. CRF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both funds - QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past year, QDVO returned 23.06% vs 11.58% for CRF. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.

Performance

QDVO vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.31% return.

QDVO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -2.27%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 23.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -1.76%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVO vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	6.99%	20.16%	9.76%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.31%	12.46%	18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and CRF is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	0.57

The correlation between QDVO and CRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QDVO vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 59
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDVO	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	0.75	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	1.14	+1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.15	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	0.78	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.00	2.59	+6.41

QDVO vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDVO	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-80.70%	+62.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-14.88%	+4.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.48%	-5.09%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-22.31%	+19.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	4.48%	-1.91%

Volatility

QDVO vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) have volatilities of 4.06% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDVO	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	4.16%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	13.41%	-3.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.67%	15.41%	-2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.56%	25.07%	-7.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.56%	25.86%	-8.30%

QDVO vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDVO vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, less than CRF's 19.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.63%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.39%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDVO and CRF in my portfolio?

QDVO and CRF have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDVO or CRF?

CRF has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to QDVO (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs CRF's -80.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.