QDVO vs. BITY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDVO returned 26.60% vs -38.65% for BITY. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.

Performance

QDVO vs. BITY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVO achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -25.23% return.

QDVO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 3.95%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 9.61%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITY

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: -22.54%
• YTD: -25.23%
• 6M: -28.66%
• 1Y: -38.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVO vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	9.91%	26.64%
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	-25.23%	-8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and BITY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

QDVO vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 63
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 60

BITY

BITY Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QDVO	BITY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	-0.97	+3.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	-1.36	+4.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	0.85	+0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	-0.82	+3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.64	-1.45	+12.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QDVO vs. BITY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the BITY Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVO and BITY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QDVO	BITY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	-0.97	+3.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.42	-0.75	+2.16

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -47.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and BITY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDVO	BITY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-47.00%	+29.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-47.00%	+36.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-47.00%	+46.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-19.77%	+17.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	26.65%	-24.14%

Volatility

QDVO vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is 2.86%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that QDVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDVO	BITY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.86%	9.61%	-6.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	30.82%	-21.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.21%	39.99%	-27.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	39.04%	-21.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	39.04%	-21.62%

QDVO vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDVO vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%, less than BITY's 40.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF	40.79%	21.53%	0.00%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.11%	9.92%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDVO and BITY in my portfolio?

QDVO and BITY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDVO or BITY?

BITY has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to QDVO (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDVO dropped -17.75% vs BITY's -47.00%.

Which ETF is better, QDVO or BITY?

On 1-year performance, QDVO leads with 26.60% vs -38.65% for BITY. On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, QDVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDVO or BITY?

Over the 1-year period, QDVO has performed better with a 26.60% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDVO or BITY?

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BITY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDVO or BITY?

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 40.79%, compared with 10.11% for QDVO.

What is the main difference between QDVO and BITY?

Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.65% for BITY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.