QDVO vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

QDVO vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QDVO

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: 8.25%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 1Y: 20.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVO vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	5.32%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVO and ACYS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

QDVO vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 57
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVO vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDVO	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	—	—

Drawdowns

QDVO vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVO drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVO and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDVO	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-0.63%	-17.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-0.05%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-0.14%	-2.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QDVO	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.83%	3.44%	+9.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	3.44%	+13.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	3.44%	+13.99%

QDVO vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDVO vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

QDVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.42%	9.92%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDVO and ACYS in my portfolio?

QDVO and ACYS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QDVO or ACYS?

On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDVO or ACYS?

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDVO or ACYS?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.42%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between QDVO and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for QDVO and 0.75% for ACYS.