QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L
QDVD.DE (iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF) and TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDVD.DE is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI USA High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while TRET.L is a REIT fund tracking the GPR Global 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDVD.DE returned 11.32%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for TRET.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDVD.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TRET.L.
Performance
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QDVD.DE is traded in EUR, while TRET.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRET.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDVD.DE achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than TRET.L's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, QDVD.DE has outperformed TRET.L with an annualized return of 11.32%, while TRET.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.35% annualized return.
QDVD.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
TRET.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.35%
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVD.DE iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF | 15.69% | 4.15% | 21.92% | 10.55% | -1.08% | 32.39% | -9.18% | 25.22% | 0.50% | 4.16% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 9.60% | 0.83% | 7.75% | 10.50% | -21.06% | 39.44% | -14.59% | 39.71% | 5.72% | -15.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDVD.DE and TRET.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QDVD.DE and TRET.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L — Risk / Return Rank
QDVD.DE
TRET.L
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDVD.DE | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.20 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.50 | 1.78 | +3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.38 | 5.60 | +13.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.55%, smaller than the maximum TRET.L drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVD.DE and TRET.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDVD.DE | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.55% | -41.66% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.27% | -8.05% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.55% | -17.58% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.55% | -30.64% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.55% | -41.66% | +9.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.47% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.67% | -12.73% | +8.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 2.57% | -1.07% |
Volatility
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF (QDVD.DE) is 3.53%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that QDVD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRET.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDVD.DE | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 4.61% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 10.02% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 12.79% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 16.00% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 18.18% | -3.37% |
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDVD.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRET.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDVD.DE vs. TRET.L - Dividend Comparison
QDVD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than TRET.L's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDVD.DE iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF | 1.07% | 1.72% | 1.88% | 2.04% | 2.34% | 1.99% | 2.72% | 2.37% | 2.43% | 2.28% | 2.19% | 2.44% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.36% | 3.54% | 3.56% | 3.54% | 4.55% | 1.86% | 4.18% | 3.32% | 5.03% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDVD.DE and TRET.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDVD.DE.
QDVD.DE is categorized as ESG, while TRET.L is REIT. QDVD.DE tracks MSCI USA High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QDVD.DE and 0.25% for TRET.L.
Find the right allocation for QDVD.DE and TRET.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer