PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVB.DE achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than AMEL.DE's 10.83% return.


QDVB.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
5.60%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.96%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*

AMEL.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
10.83%
6M
8.65%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVB.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF
9.84%0.36%29.35%26.56%-16.50%39.05%5.36%37.25%-2.65%7.18%
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
10.83%38.06%-22.22%28.09%16.34%-3.21%-21.29%20.69%-3.27%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

0.41

The correlation between QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVB.DE
QDVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVB.DEAMEL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.16

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

9.66

+0.67

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVB.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.90

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.45

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.12

+0.70

Drawdowns

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, smaller than the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -52.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVB.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-52.69%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-10.86%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-25.38%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-25.38%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.86%

+10.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-17.89%

+12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.57%

-1.66%

Volatility

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) is 2.46%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that QDVB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVB.DEAMEL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

5.32%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

15.30%

-8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

18.10%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

20.90%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

25.27%

-8.83%

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QDVB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QDVB.DE nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

QDVB.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AMEL.DE is Latin America Equities. QDVB.DE tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality, while AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVB.DE and AMEL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer