PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDVB.DE vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QDVB.DE is traded in EUR, while DGRW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDVB.DE achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 11.12% return.


QDVB.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
5.60%
YTD
9.84%
6M
9.96%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*

DGRW

1D
0.57%
1M
4.87%
YTD
11.12%
6M
9.79%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDVB.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF
9.84%0.36%29.35%26.56%-16.50%39.05%5.36%37.25%-2.65%7.18%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
11.12%-1.14%24.71%15.10%-0.53%33.77%4.48%32.47%-0.94%11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QDVB.DE and DGRW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2016

0.58

The correlation between QDVB.DE and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDVB.DE
QDVB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDVB.DEDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.23

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

12.78

-2.45

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDVB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDVB.DE and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDVB.DEDGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.91

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.94

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Drawdowns

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDVB.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.26%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -31.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDVB.DE and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDVB.DEDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.26%

-31.38%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-6.16%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-20.78%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-20.78%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-3.71%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.55%

+0.36%

Volatility

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF (QDVB.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 2.28%. This indicates that QDVB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDVB.DEDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.28%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

7.64%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

10.40%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

14.23%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

16.97%

-0.53%

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDVB.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDVB.DE vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

QDVB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
QDVB.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDVB.DE and DGRW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVB.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVB.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.

QDVB.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. QDVB.DE tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDVB.DE and 0.28% for DGRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDVB.DE and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer