PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. INTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTE vs. INTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Intel Corporation (INTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than INTC's 198.83% return.


QDTE

1D
1.85%
1M
0.70%
YTD
12.44%
6M
11.71%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INTC

1D
11.19%
1M
-11.73%
YTD
198.83%
6M
173.62%
1Y
449.70%
3Y*
53.12%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. INTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
12.44%19.32%16.07%
INTC
Intel Corporation
198.83%84.04%-56.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and INTC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. INTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

INTC
INTC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. INTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and Intel Corporation (INTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QDTEINTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.64

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

18.76

-15.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

44.28

-30.76

QDTE vs. INTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the INTC Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and INTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QDTEINTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

6.16

-3.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.36

+0.81

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. INTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum INTC drawdown of -82.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and INTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTEINTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-82.25%

+59.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-24.17%

+13.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-14.81%

+11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-36.67%

+33.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

10.22%

-7.67%

Volatility

QDTE vs. INTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 6.57%, while Intel Corporation (INTC) has a volatility of 26.82%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTEINTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

26.82%

-20.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

57.68%

-45.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

73.75%

-58.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

52.06%

-33.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

44.07%

-25.35%

Dividends

QDTE vs. INTC - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.14%, while INTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTC
Intel Corporation
0.00%0.00%1.87%1.47%5.52%2.70%2.65%2.11%2.56%2.33%2.87%2.79%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
44.14%49.49%32.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTE and INTC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTC has higher volatility (26.82%) compared to QDTE (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs INTC's -82.25%.

INTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.16 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTE and INTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer