PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDTE vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDTE vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 13.50% return, which is significantly higher than GOOY's 8.94% return.


QDTE

1D
1.15%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
13.50%
6M
12.07%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.42%
1M
-10.48%
YTD
8.94%
6M
8.62%
1Y
76.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and GOOY is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.59

The correlation between QDTE and GOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDTE vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDTEGOOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.56

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.76

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

16.44

-4.29

QDTE vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and GOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDTEGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-24.40%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-16.15%

+5.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-12.37%

+9.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-6.30%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.67%

-2.02%

Volatility

QDTE vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) at 7.91%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDTEGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

7.91%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

17.70%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

23.64%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

23.40%

-4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

23.40%

-4.43%

QDTE vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDTE vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.00%, less than GOOY's 53.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
53.92%41.50%36.74%7.90%
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
45.00%49.49%32.09%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDTE and GOOY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTE has higher volatility (8.47%) compared to GOOY (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 76.46% vs 32.12% for QDTE. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, GOOY has been the lower-risk option at 7.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 76.46% return vs 32.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 53.92%, compared with 45.00% for QDTE.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.99% for GOOY.

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDTE and GOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer