QDTE vs. DMAY
QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both exchange-traded funds - QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DMAY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. QDTE is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 40.36% vs 12.37% for DMAY. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
QDTE vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.58% | 19.32% | 16.07% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 9.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDTE and DMAY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QDTE and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
QDTE vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDTE
DMAY
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
QDTE
DMAY
Basic Materials
QDTE
-
DMAY
Communication Services
QDTE
-
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
QDTE
-
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
QDTE
-
DMAY
Energy
QDTE
-
DMAY
Healthcare
QDTE
-
DMAY
Industrials
QDTE
-
DMAY
Real Estate
QDTE
-
DMAY
Technology
QDTE
-
DMAY
Utilities
QDTE
-
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDTE vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
QDTE
DMAY
QDTE vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDTE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.60 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 3.73 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 22.76 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDTE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.65 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.88 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
QDTE vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDTE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.86% | -13.90% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -3.36% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.30% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -2.24% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 0.55% | +1.97% |
Volatility
QDTE vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that QDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDTE | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 0.84% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 3.74% | +7.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 4.73% | +10.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 9.02% | +9.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.43% | 8.43% | +10.00% |
QDTE vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDTE vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.16%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 42.16% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDTE and DMAY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDTE has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 40.36% vs 12.37% for DMAY. On fees, DMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 40.36% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 42.16%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
QDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while DMAY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.85% for DMAY.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDTE and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer