QDTE vs. AAPW

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QDTE returned 24.69% vs 61.94% for AAPW. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AAPW.

Performance

QDTE vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDTE achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than AAPW's 21.74% return.

QDTE

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -4.51%
• 6M: 9.76%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.39%

AAPW

• 1D: -2.91%
• 1M: 11.04%
• 6M: 31.34%
• YTD: 21.74%
• 1Y: 61.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDTE vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	11.03%	12.67%
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	21.74%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QDTE and AAPW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.40

QDTE vs. AAPW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QDTE	AAPW
Financial Services	5.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QDTE vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 59
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 80
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDTE vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDTE	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	2.09	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.81	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.36	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	3.59	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	8.55	+0.40

QDTE vs. AAPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the AAPW Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDTE and AAPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDTE vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDTE drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDTE and AAPW.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDTE	AAPW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.86%	-36.28%	+13.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.20%	-17.36%	+7.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.91%	-2.91%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-10.64%	+7.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.77%	7.27%	-4.50%

Volatility

QDTE vs. AAPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) is 7.01%, while AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) has a volatility of 12.17%. This indicates that QDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDTE	AAPW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.01%	12.17%	-5.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.25%	23.14%	-8.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.46%	29.86%	-12.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	35.02%	-15.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	35.02%	-15.96%

QDTE vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDTE vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison

QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.99%, more than AAPW's 29.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	29.42%	28.83%	0.00%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	45.99%	49.49%	32.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDTE and AAPW in my portfolio?

QDTE and AAPW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDTE or AAPW?

AAPW has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to QDTE (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDTE dropped -22.86% vs AAPW's -36.28%.

Which ETF is better, QDTE or AAPW?

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 61.94% vs 24.69% for QDTE. On fees, QDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, QDTE has been the lower-risk option at 7.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDTE or AAPW?

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 61.94% return vs 24.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDTE or AAPW?

QDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDTE or AAPW?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 45.99%, compared with 29.42% for AAPW.

What is the main difference between QDTE and AAPW?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for QDTE and 0.99% for AAPW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.