QDSIX vs. RMDFX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX).
QDSIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jun 7, 2020. RMDFX is managed by Aspiriant. It was launched on Dec 13, 2015.
Performance
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund | 2.86% | 16.36% | 9.71% | 8.88% | 14.69% | 10.64% | 5.50% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 2.53% | 18.85% | 1.45% | 8.01% | -6.84% | 4.20% | 9.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDSIX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than RMDFX's 2.53% return.
QDSIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- —
RMDFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDSIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
QDSIX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank
QDSIX
RMDFX
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDSIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 3.47 | -1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 4.74 | -2.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.75 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 4.07 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 17.19 | -7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDSIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 3.47 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.46 | 0.83 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.78 | +0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDSIX and RMDFX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison
QDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than RMDFX's 4.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund | 2.17% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 11.35% | 8.22% | 6.07% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMDFX Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund | 4.52% | 4.63% | 0.00% | 3.69% | 0.78% | 5.37% | 2.28% | 3.78% | 4.11% | 2.16% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDSIX drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum RMDFX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDSIX and RMDFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDSIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -15.96% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.53% | -4.19% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.06% | -14.63% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -3.79% | +2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -3.37% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 0.99% | +0.29% |
Volatility
QDSIX vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) is 1.56%, while Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that QDSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDSIX | RMDFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 1.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 3.83% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.36% | 5.01% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 6.34% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 6.20% | +1.19% |