QDPL vs. SPXM

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QDPL (Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. QDPL is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. Over the past year, QDPL returned 20.20% vs 8.72% for SPXM. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QDPL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.

Performance

QDPL vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QDPL

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 8.57%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 1Y: 20.20%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: 12.25%
• 10Y*: —

SPXM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 8.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDPL vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	10.05%	9.80%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.00%	9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QDPL and SPXM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

QDPL vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDPL

QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 62
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SPXM

SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 60
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDPL vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDPL	SPXM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.40	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	1.98	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	2.11	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.34	9.87	+0.47

QDPL vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDPL and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDPL vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and SPXM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDPL	SPXM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-5.08%	-17.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-5.08%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.75%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-0.78%	-4.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	—	—

Volatility

QDPL vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDPL	SPXM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	0.00%	+3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	3.78%	+6.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	7.65%	+4.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	7.59%	+7.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	7.59%	+7.42%

QDPL vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDPL vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF	4.54%	4.84%	5.43%	6.30%	7.27%	2.44%
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDPL and SPXM in my portfolio?

QDPL and SPXM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QDPL or SPXM?

QDPL has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDPL dropped -22.59% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

Which ETF is better, QDPL or SPXM?

On 1-year performance, QDPL leads with 20.20% vs 8.72% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QDPL or SPXM?

Over the 1-year period, QDPL has performed better with a 20.20% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDPL or SPXM?

SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QDPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QDPL or SPXM?

QDPL has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

What is the main difference between QDPL and SPXM?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QDPL and 0.47% for SPXM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.