QDIV vs. SPHQ
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QDIV tracks the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index while SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV returned 8.61%/yr vs 12.81%/yr for SPHQ. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 14.14% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.14K | $81.04K | $128.34K | |
| $121.34M | $134.31M | $144.70M |
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 16.62% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.14% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and SPHQ is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDIV and SPHQ has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
SPHQ
Financial Services
QDIV
SPHQ
Industrials
QDIV
SPHQ
Healthcare
QDIV
SPHQ
Technology
QDIV
SPHQ
Energy
QDIV
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
SPHQ
Communication Services
QDIV
SPHQ
Basic Materials
QDIV
SPHQ
Real Estate
QDIV
-
SPHQ
-
Utilities
QDIV
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
SPHQ
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDIV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.45 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 8.64 | -1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -57.83% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -8.90% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -16.57% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -25.04% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -5.50% | +4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -10.64% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.52% | +0.60% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.77% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 12.37% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 14.51% | -2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 16.74% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 17.98% | +1.37% |
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QDIV vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than SPHQ's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.79% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDIV has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to SPHQ (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 12.81% vs 8.61% for QDIV. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QDIV.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.10% for SPHQ.
QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.15% for SPHQ.
QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer