PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDIV vs. HIGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDIV vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.37% return.


QDIV

1D
0.74%
1M
1.24%
6M
8.71%
YTD
12.11%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*

HIGH

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.07%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.37%
1Y
-3.09%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDIV vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
12.11%3.16%10.62%5.18%4.80%
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
-0.37%4.35%1.52%7.70%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIV and HIGH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDIV vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HIGH
HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDIV vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDIVHIGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.93

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

-0.44

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

-0.72

+4.96

QDIV vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIV and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDIV vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than HIGH's maximum drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and HIGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDIVHIGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.20%

-9.50%

-31.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-7.08%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-9.50%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-7.11%

+6.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-2.51%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

4.32%

-1.11%

Volatility

QDIV vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 2.10%. This indicates that QDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDIVHIGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

2.10%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

3.72%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

7.30%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

9.49%

+5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

9.49%

+9.87%

QDIV vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDIV vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than HIGH's 7.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HIGH
Simplify Enhanced Income ETF
7.09%7.71%8.34%9.40%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
2.90%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDIV and HIGH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDIV has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to HIGH (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

On 3-year performance, QDIV leads with 9.73% vs 2.82% for HIGH. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QDIV has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 2.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.09%, compared with 2.90% for QDIV.

QDIV is categorized as Dividend, while HIGH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.50% for HIGH.

QDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDIV and HIGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer