QDIV vs. EMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV).
QDIV and EMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDIV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2018. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016. Both QDIV and EMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QDIV vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDIV vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 6.62% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | -1.92% | 11.90% | 0.06% | -1.03% | -18.19% | 1.11% | -0.09% | 14.93% | -5.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's -1.92% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDV
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.42%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDIV vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
EMDV
QDIV vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIV | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 1.05 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.12 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 3.72 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIV | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | -0.19 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.20 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and EMDV is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QDIV vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than EMDV's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.99% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than EMDV's maximum drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and EMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -39.20% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -7.48% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -34.97% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -17.40% | +12.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -13.52% | +7.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.24% | +1.29% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) is 3.04%, while ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that QDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 5.42% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 8.29% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 11.95% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 15.39% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 18.28% | +1.31% |