QDIV vs. DGRS
QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) and DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds - QDIV tracks the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index while DGRS tracks the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV returned 8.61%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for DGRS. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QDIV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DGRS.
Performance
QDIV vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDIV achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than DGRS's 23.92% return.
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.23%
DGRS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- YTD
- 23.92%
- 1Y
- 34.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.65M | $2.40M | $1.87M | |
| $41.14K | $81.04K | $128.34K |
QDIV vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 16.62% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 23.92% | -0.43% | 10.40% | 21.16% | -13.11% | 23.11% | 7.86% | 24.20% | -14.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and DGRS is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between QDIV and DGRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QDIV vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDIV
DGRS
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
QDIV
DGRS
Financial Services
QDIV
DGRS
Industrials
QDIV
DGRS
Healthcare
QDIV
DGRS
Technology
QDIV
DGRS
Energy
QDIV
DGRS
Consumer Cyclical
QDIV
DGRS
Communication Services
QDIV
DGRS
Basic Materials
QDIV
DGRS
Real Estate
QDIV
-
DGRS
Utilities
QDIV
-
DGRS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
DGRS
QDIV vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDIV | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.55 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 11.35 | -4.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, smaller than the maximum DGRS drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and DGRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -44.83% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -9.68% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -27.57% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -27.57% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -6.65% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.02% | +0.10% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) at 4.02%. This indicates that QDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.02% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 10.67% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 17.07% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 20.24% | -4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 23.59% | -4.24% |
QDIV vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDIV vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than DGRS's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.00% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.79% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDIV and DGRS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDIV has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to DGRS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIV dropped -41.20% vs DGRS's -44.83%.
On 5-year performance, DGRS leads with 9.03% vs 8.61% for QDIV. On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGRS.
QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.00% for DGRS.
QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index, while DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QDIV and 0.38% for DGRS.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDIV and DGRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer