QDIV vs. DFND
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND).
QDIV and DFND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDIV is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2018. DFND is a passively managed fund by SRN Advisors that tracks the performance of the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. It was launched on Jan 14, 2016. Both QDIV and DFND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QDIV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDIV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 6.62% | 3.16% | 10.62% | 5.18% | -0.50% | 28.99% | 0.03% | 29.00% | -12.20% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -2.86% |
Returns By Period
QDIV
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 6.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDIV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDIV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QDIV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
QDIV
DFND
QDIV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 0.46 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 0.81 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | -0.05 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | -0.12 | +2.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.46 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.21 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.36 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDIV and DFND is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QDIV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDIV Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF | 2.99% | 3.13% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 3.02% | 2.44% | 3.06% | 2.84% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
QDIV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDIV drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV and DFND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.20% | -22.65% | -18.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.82% | -7.48% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -22.65% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.38% | -3.69% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -5.73% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.80% | -0.27% |
Volatility
QDIV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that QDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDIV | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 0.00% | +3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 8.52% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 17.95% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 22.58% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 19.15% | +0.44% |