QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

QDIV.L (iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - QDIV.L is a Dividend fund tracking the iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while FUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QDIV.L returned 11.80%/yr vs 11.93%/yr for FUQA.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QDIV.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.

Performance

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QDIV.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIV.L achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than FUQA.L's 10.21% return.

QDIV.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.14%
• 6M: 11.96%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 1Y: 24.05%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 11.00%

FUQA.L

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 9.85%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 1Y: 21.39%
• 3Y*: 17.06%
• 5Y*: 11.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QDIV.L iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	13.61%	16.66%	15.35%	14.30%	-6.23%	21.82%	0.08%	21.36%	-3.83%	13.41%
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	10.21%	16.75%	17.51%	17.75%	-10.69%	26.66%	11.54%	32.33%	-4.62%	-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIV.L and FUQA.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017	0.80

The correlation between QDIV.L and FUQA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDIV.L

QDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
QDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
QDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FUQA.L

FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QDIV.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.12	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.48	3.24	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.38	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	2.67	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	11.69	+0.48

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIV.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIV.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.39%, smaller than the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIV.L and FUQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QDIV.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.39%	-35.38%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.99%	-7.97%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.36%	-19.14%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.36%	-20.19%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	0.00%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-6.77%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	1.83%	+0.21%

Volatility

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (QDIV.L) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.68%. This indicates that QDIV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QDIV.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	2.68%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	7.52%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	10.05%	+1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	19.97%	-5.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	23.00%	-7.92%

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIV.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QDIV.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

QDIV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while FUQA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDIV.L iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	1.52%	1.67%	1.93%	2.00%	2.27%	2.08%	2.50%	2.36%	2.44%	2.15%	2.32%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QDIV.L and FUQA.L in my portfolio?

QDIV.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QDIV.L or FUQA.L?

On fees, FUQA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QDIV.L or FUQA.L?

FUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QDIV.L.

What is the main difference between QDIV.L and FUQA.L?

QDIV.L is categorized as Dividend, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. QDIV.L tracks iShares MSCI USA Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for QDIV.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.