PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDIBX vs. ABNFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDIBX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than ABNFX's -0.96% return.


QDIBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.56%
6M
-0.45%
YTD
-0.45%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.94%

ABNFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-1.22%
YTD
-0.96%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
-0.56%
10Y*
1.66%
ALL TIME*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
-0.45%7.72%1.66%6.71%-14.11%-0.17%6.77%-0.10%
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
-0.96%7.42%1.42%4.29%-13.08%-0.88%10.86%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QDIBX and ABNFX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019

0.90

The correlation between QDIBX and ABNFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDIBX vs. ABNFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDIBX
QDIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QDIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ABNFX
ABNFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ABNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDIBXABNFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

0.93

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

2.27

+0.22

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDIBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the ABNFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDIBX and ABNFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDIBX drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, which is greater than ABNFX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDIBX and ABNFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDIBXABNFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-17.69%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-3.09%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

-5.11%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.63%

-17.65%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-3.05%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-3.28%

-3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.26%

-0.04%

Volatility

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) is 0.82%, while American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2 (ABNFX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that QDIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDIBXABNFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.95%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

3.02%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

3.81%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.59%

5.97%

+0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

4.90%

+1.31%

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDIBX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than ABNFX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDIBX vs. ABNFX - Dividend Comparison

QDIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than ABNFX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNFX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America® Class F-2
4.06%4.37%4.55%3.19%2.37%2.07%5.15%3.72%2.65%2.10%2.31%2.24%
QDIBX
Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans
3.51%3.50%3.55%3.65%2.51%1.80%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDIBX and ABNFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABNFX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to QDIBX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDIBX dropped -19.63% vs ABNFX's -17.69%.

QDIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDIBX and ABNFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer